Enterprises are rethinking their reliance on hyperscalers such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud as operational costs rise and infrastructure needs become more specialized. The shift isn’t a retreat from cloud computing but a reassessment of where workloads belong and how control, performance, and cost efficiency can be balanced. Across sectors, IT leaders are turning to smaller vendors, colocation providers, and modern private-cloud environments that offer predictable economics and data sovereignty without sacrificing scalability.
A Broadcom-commissioned Private Cloud Outlook 2025 report found that 69 percent of enterprises are considering repatriating workloads from public to private cloud, with more than one-third having already done so. Far from signaling disillusionment, this repatriation reflects a more nuanced strategy: placing each workload in the environment that best meets its cost, security, and latency requirements. “Private cloud now outperforms public cloud,” said Hock Tan, CEO of Broadcom, at VMware Explore 2025, citing VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 as an end-to-end platform that restores performance and control. “It has better security, better cost management, and of course, greater control,” he said.
Rising cloud bills are one catalyst. Hyperscalers’ variable-use pricing and layered managed services often produce unpredictable expenses once workloads scale. Many enterprises initially drawn by pay-as-you-go flexibility now describe double-digit annual cost growth that outpaces revenue. Smaller providers, by contrast, promise transparent pricing and infrastructure tuned to specific workloads. The economics are especially compelling for steady, compute-intensive applications, AI inference, analytics, or ERP, where predictable demand justifies dedicated capacity.


